Show simple item record

dc.creatorMaslowe, Gregory A.
dc.date2009-10-19
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-21T19:53:23Z
dc.date.available2012-08-21T19:53:23Z
dc.date.issued2012-08-21
dc.identifierhttp://digilib.bu.edu/journals/ojs/index.php/jfse/article/view/164
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2144/4011
dc.descriptionThe author explores the role of critical realism as the dominant epistemology in the science-and-religion dialogue. He presents the historical and philosophical peculiarities of this approach that have lead to its preeminence. Asking whether \"science and religion \" would benefit from greater epistemological variety, he presents a possible alternative to critical realism: enactionism, as articulated by Francisco Varela, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch in their book The Embodied Mind. Enactionism is not proposed as the replacement for critical realism, but the author wonders how science and religion would look given an enactionist epistemology.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBoston Theological Institute
dc.relationhttp://digilib.bu.edu/journals/ojs/index.php/jfse/article/view/164/163
dc.sourceJournal of Faith and Science Exchange; Journal of Faith and Science Exchange, Vol. 5
dc.titleHow Critical is Realism?en_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record