Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLiebschutz, Janeen_US
dc.contributor.authorBattaglia, Tracyen_US
dc.contributor.authorFinley, Erinen_US
dc.contributor.authorAverbuch, Talien_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-01-09T20:53:55Z
dc.date.available2012-01-09T20:53:55Z
dc.date.copyright2008en_US
dc.date.issued2008-7-4en_US
dc.identifier.citationLiebschutz, Jane, Tracy Battaglia, Erin Finley, Tali Averbuch. "Disclosing intimate partner violence to health care clinicians - What a difference the setting makes: A qualitative study" BMC Public Health 8:229. (2008)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2144/2904
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND. Despite endorsement by national organizations, the impact of screening for intimate partner violence (IPV) is understudied, particularly as it occurs in different clinical settings. We analyzed interviews of IPV survivors to understand the risks and benefits of disclosing IPV to clinicians across specialties. METHODS. Participants were English-speaking female IPV survivors recruited through IPV programs in Massachusetts. In-depth interviews describing medical encounters related to abuse were analyzed for common themes using Grounded Theory qualitative research methods. Encounters with health care clinicians were categorized by outcome (IPV disclosure by patient, discovery evidenced by discussion of IPV by clinician without patient disclosure, or non-disclosure), attribute (beneficial, unhelpful, harmful), and specialty (emergency department (ED), primary care (PC), obstetrics/gynecology (OB/GYN)). RESULTS. Of 27 participants aged 18–56, 5 were white, 10 Latina, and 12 black. Of 59 relevant health care encounters, 23 were in ED, 17 in OB/GYN, and 19 in PC. Seven of 9 ED disclosures were characterized as unhelpful; the majority of disclosures in PC and OB/GYN were characterized as beneficial. There were no harmful disclosures in any setting. Unhelpful disclosures resulted in emotional distress and alienation from health care. Regardless of whether disclosure occurred, beneficial encounters were characterized by familiarity with the clinician, acknowledgement of the abuse, respect and relevant referrals. CONCLUSION. While no harms resulted from IPV disclosure, survivor satisfaction with disclosure is shaped by the setting of the encounter. Clinicians should aim to build a therapeutic relationship with IPV survivors that empowers and educates patients and does not demand disclosure.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.rightsCopyright 2008 Liebschutz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0en_US
dc.titleDisclosing Intimate Partner Violence to Health Care Clinicians - What a Difference the Setting Makes: A Qualitative Studyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2458-8-229en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid18601725en_US
dc.identifier.pmcid2474863en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright 2008 Liebschutz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright 2008 Liebschutz et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.