Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOzonoff, David Men_US
dc.contributor.authorGrandjean, Philippeen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-29T22:49:47Z
dc.date.available2011-12-29T22:49:47Z
dc.date.copyright2010en_US
dc.date.issued2010-7-8en_US
dc.identifier.citationOzonoff, David M, Philippe Grandjean. "Milestones and Impact Factors" Environmental Health 9:35. (2010)en_US
dc.identifier.issn1476-069Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2144/2617
dc.description.abstractEnvironmental Health has just received its first Impact Factor by Thomson ISI. At a level of 2.48, this achievement is quite satisfactory and places Environmental Health in the top 25% of environmental science journals. When the journal was launched in 2002, it was still unclear whether the Open Access publishing model could be made into a viable commercial enterprise within the biomedical field. During the past eight years, Open Access journals have become widely available, although still covering only about 15% of journal titles. Major funding agencies and institutions, including prominent US universities, now require that researchers publish in Open Access journals. Because of the profound role of scientific journals for the sharing of results and communication between researchers, the advent of Open Access may be of as much significance as the transition from handwriting to printing via moveable type. As Environmental Health is an electronic Open Access journal, the numbers of downloads at the journal website can be retrieved. The top-20 list of articles most frequently accessed shows that all of them have been downloaded over 10,000 times. Back in 2002, the first article published was accessed only 49 times during the following month. A year later, the server had over 1,000 downloads per month, and now the total number of monthly downloads approaches 50,000. These statistics complement the Impact Factor and confirm the viability of Open Access in our field of research. The advent of digital media and its decentralized mode of distribution - the internet - have dramatically changed the control and financing of scientific information dissemination, while facilitating peer review, accelerating editorial handling, and supporting much needed transparency. Both the meaning and means of "having an impact" are therefore changing, as will the degree and way in which scientific journals remain "factors" in that impact.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.rightsCopyright 2010 Ozonoff and Grandjean; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0en_US
dc.titleMilestones and Impact Factorsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1476-069X-9-35en_US
dc.identifier.pubmedid20615249en_US
dc.identifier.pmcid2909227en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Copyright 2010 Ozonoff and Grandjean; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Copyright 2010 Ozonoff and Grandjean; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.